|
Tennis:
This year's edition was kinda bad, with Nadal, Federer & Djokovic missing, along with half the fans and all of the kids
By
Sara Scott
INDIAN WELLS, Calif..
(Oct.24 2021)
After the 2020 edition was cancelled on
the day before it was to start due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the 2021
BNP Paribas Open returned eighteen months later, in a special October
edition, to the sound of crickets instead of the cheers of paying fans.
Tournament spokespeople scrambled to
explain the staggering 50 percent drop-off in paid attendance from
2020, blaming the virus,.as well as the
timing of the event, saying Eastern snowbirds, among the most reliable
tennis fans, hadn't yet arrived for their annual wintering in the Palm
Springs / Palm Desert area.
It didn't help that fan favorites Roger
Federer, Novak Djokovic and Rafael Nadal all sat out the tournament.
This despite the opening of the men's draw to its largest in tournament
history - or perhaps because of it, as the three stars weren't looking
forward to having to possibly play annoying first round matches this
late in the season. With upsets taking care of the rest of the seeds,
two massively talented but complete unknowns - Paula Badosa and Cameron
Norrie ended up with the trophies.
Still, pent up demand after 18 months
of no tennis should have brought an onslaught of tennis deprived
fans.
Curiosity about some hot young
newcomers alone should have increased attendance. Though the stadiums
sat half empty, news of that often precipitates casual and budget
minded fans to come out. In previous years BNP Paribas stadium
tickets were out of reach pricewise, or simply sold out, particularly
on the weekends.
But not this year. The usual fans stayed away
making access affordable. Cheap - even below face value - tickets
flooded the secondary
market and many opportunists, as well as potential new fans would have
sprung for
the easy tickets and filled the stadiums, if not blocked by a series of difficult and unnecessary hurdles
Beyond the date change, the 2021
edition was handicapped by a slate of self-defeating new policies. There were
new rules designed to head off a possible COVID outbreak (yet for some
reason, no masks required). And other new rules, of less clear purpose,
conspired to confuse fans, cancel tournament trips and terminate box seat
subscriptions.
There may have been resistance to the forced usage
of the special BNP Paribas health passport.
All patrons, as well as all employees, media members, servants,
volunteers, vendors, security, medics, athletes and coaches would need
to provide proof of full vaccination from COVID-19 or be barred from
entering the venue. Exempt were those who didn't have to scan in,
potentially including celebrities, politicians, organizers and owners.
Proof had to be supplied via a
special BNP Paribas app, to be downloaded to your smartphone (not
included).
Keep in mind that since the tournament's
inception two decades ago, that is until 2019, fans could decide
on the spur of the moment to
just drop in and watch some great tennis. Such spontaniety is now
prohibited no matter how lucrative it was, now advance planning and
forethought is required. Confusion about the new policy was
not mitigated much by this
official BNP Paribas Entry to Tennis Paradise instructional video,
which detailed several steps and preparations one needed to have
performed before even being allowed on the grounds to buy tickets. In
2019 and before, you just showed up, bought a ticket, and went in. The
new system is claimed to be better, but for whom.
If you didn't watch the
video, and you're not alone, it detailed what, but not how,
one needed to
do using this app, in order to patronize this tennis tournament.
One was required to send ones medical records and financial
information to BNP Paribas, use the app to arrange a parking pass, and
verify that their clear plastic bag was of the proper size and format.
Uninformed or
out-of-compliance tennis fans, who are among the most affluent in
sports,
encountered an unaccustomed level of pushback, interference and
resistance from power mad
volunteers and security, finding themselves as often as not, denied
entrance to the
venue despite their wealth, influence and support for the game.
Even digitally-savvy tennis supporters
were confused by the lack of information. For instance, a link to the
official app was not provided in those official BNP Paribas Open
articles. It was presumed that anyone with a (now mandatory) smartphone
would know to head over to the App Store, search on the BNP Paribas
open, then upload their private information into it. And consider the possibility of fake apps.
It is
trivial - literally trivial - to create a fake app with the name BNP
Paribas Open, and upload it to the Google Play Store. Such an app could
enable unauthorized parties to collect medical and financial
information.
A visit to the app store shows a dozen apps with
the name BNP Paribas. it is easy to find the official one. it is the
one with the lowest rating and the worst reviews.
The official app sports a 2.8 star rating out
of five on Play Store, and 2.2 on the Apple App Store, with most of the
critical reviews complaining of the app freezing. Can you imagine being
a senior fan returning to Indian Wells, in this orwellian desert
paradise, struggling to get this thing to display their entry
barcode to an impatient volunteer, or display their stadium
ticket three or four times to volunteers on the way down to their
seat, or to use it to attempt to pay for a meal in a place that
cash is banned? Their best bet would have been to hand the phone to a
kid, the true smartphone experts, but they have all been banned from
the venue.
And for anyone, installing and opening an app sweeps your
smartphone for far more information than the traditional phone web or
in person ticket purchase. This app gives them a lot more
information. For instance, via Location, they know where you are, to
within two meters, any time the app is running.
Surprising that the app that gives organizers so
much information about you is so lousy at its supposed job of getting
you around the tournament. Even the proficient have difficulty
and fear embarrassing moments of app dysfunction while people are
waiting, but this presumption of smartphone
proficiency is gallingly ageist, as many of our senior patrons are not
smartphone proficient, or possibly never even owned one until now. And speaking of
ageist, people under 12 were completely banned from the venue.
Certainly kids are annoying, they don't have interesting amounts of
money and it's always a good idea to keep the riff raff out. I hate to
get snarky but it's really hard to justify this policy in my mind.
Their tickets went unsold along with those of the family members who
would have accompanied them, costing the tournament parking,
food and souvenir revenue.
But who does have
interesting amounts of money? BNP Paribas Bank, the title sponsor and
primary contributor to the tournaments world class $17 million prize
purse. With the contract running out in two years, tournament
officials might soon have to scramble for new sponsorship if fan
support and interest doesnt improve dramatically in 2022.
|